Eating Disorders Statistics in Recent Years

Eating disorders affect millions of Americans, yet persistent myths and underdiagnosis obscure their true prevalence. These illnesses can strike people of every background and often carry serious - sometimes fatal - health consequences.

Over the past decade, large-scale studies have shed light on how commonly eating disorders occur, who is most at risk, and which factors can aid or hinder recovery. Understanding the data can help families, communities, and professionals recognize warning signs, advocate for better care, and support research-based treatment approaches.

Key Statistics at a Glance

• 9% of the U.S. population (about 28.8 million people) will experience an eating disorder in their lifetime.
• Less than 6% of individuals with eating disorders are medically underweight, challenging the stereotype that one must appear “very thin” to be ill.
• Eating disorders have the second-highest mortality rate of any mental health condition (only opioid use disorder ranks higher).
• One recent estimate placed the annual economic cost of eating disorders in the U.S. at $64.7 billion, factoring in healthcare, lost work productivity, and caregiving.

Prevalence and Core Diagnoses

Understanding how many people live with an eating disorder - and which diagnoses are most prevalent - guides public health priorities.

• Lifetime prevalence: An estimated 9% of Americans experience an eating disorder (ED). This figure includes men, women, transgender, and non-binary individuals; while women have historically been diagnosed at higher rates, men account for roughly 25–30% of ED cases.
• Disorder breakdowns:
  • Anorexia Nervosa (AN) affects about 0.16% of females and 0.09% of males annually. It has one of the highest mortality rates of any psychiatric disorder.
  • Bulimia Nervosa (BN) affects about 0.32% of women and 0.05% of men in a given year. Many individuals with bulimia maintain what looks like a “normal” weight, making the illness harder to detect.
  • Binge Eating Disorder (BED) is now the most common eating disorder in the U.S. by diagnostic count, affecting about 0.96% of women and 0.26% of men annually.
  • Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorder (OSFED) is actually the single largest category, encompassing a wide range of atypical or partially defined symptoms that still cause serious impairment.

Although anorexia is often the most visible in media portrayals, BED and OSFED each account for more cases nationwide. Importantly, many people do not fit neatly into strict diagnostic criteria, and symptoms can change over time.

Sponsored

Online Therapy Can Help

Over 3 million people use BetterHelp. Their services are:

• Professional and effective
• Affordable and convenient
• Personalized and discreet
• Easy to start

Find a Therapist

Answer a few questions to get started

Typical Age Ranges

Age of onset data reveals when preventive efforts might be most effective.

• Adolescence: Median onset for anorexia and bulimia often centers around 18 years old. This timing overlaps with major life changes - starting high school or college - and heightened social pressures.
• Late teens to early 20s: Binge eating disorder frequently starts a bit later, averaging in the early to mid-20s. Some cases, however, begin even earlier in adolescence, while others emerge in middle age.
• Broad age span: Though teens and young adults remain the highest-risk ages, eating disorders can and do occur at any stage of life. Clinicians report new-onset cases in adults well into their 40s or 50s, highlighting that EDs are not limited to youth.

Because many signs - food avoidance, weight changes, body dissatisfaction - can hide in plain sight, early detection among adolescents is crucial. Family-based therapy is often most effective when started soon after symptoms first appear.

Sponsored

Get Professional Help

BetterHelp can connect you to an addiction and mental health counselor.

Find a Therapist

Answer a few questions to get started

Gender and Sexual Identity Factors

Examining gender differences underscores that no group is immune.

• Higher rates in females: Overall, females are about 2–4 times as likely to develop an ED as males. This gap is especially large in bulimia and OSFED, but anorexia in males is more common than previously believed.
• Male considerations: Approximately 6.6 million U.S. males will have an eating disorder in their lifetime. Males may underreport symptoms due to stigma or clinicians’ biases.
• Transgender and non-binary individuals: These groups experience elevated rates of anorexia, bulimia, and binge eating. In some research, up to 10.5% of transgender men and 8.1% of transgender women reported a diagnosed eating disorder - far higher than cisgender population estimates.
• Presentation differences: Men with EDs may focus more on achieving a lean, muscular physique or use excessive exercise. Women are more often concerned with thinness. Gender-diverse individuals can feel distress around specific body traits tied to gender identity.

Increasing awareness that EDs affect people of every gender identity - and that the behaviors often appear differently - helps reduce underdiagnosis and missed opportunities for early intervention.

Recovery Rates and Approaches

Recovery research highlights how effective different treatments can be, but it also reminds us that many patients need long-term support.

• General recovery likelihood: Between 50% and 60% of those who receive proper care eventually achieve full remission. Others show partial improvement or continue to struggle with chronic symptoms.
• Evidence-based therapies:
  • Family-Based Therapy (FBT) is particularly effective for adolescents with anorexia, leading to over 50% in full remission after one year in some studies.
  • Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a gold-standard for bulimia and binge eating, with about 50% of BED patients achieving remission. For anorexia or bulimia, CBT typically helps roughly 28–33% reach full remission, which still outperforms older psychodynamic approaches.
• Medication role:
  • SSRIs (e.g., Fluoxetine) can reduce binge/purge frequency in bulimia.
  • Lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse) is FDA-approved for binge eating disorder and can help curb binge episodes when combined with therapy.
• Relapse rates: Many patients relapse, especially in the first year post-treatment. Intensive follow-up and support groups mitigate this risk. Yet long-term studies show that about two-thirds of people with anorexia or bulimia eventually regain healthy functioning if they remain engaged in treatment.

Early intervention - especially in adolescence - significantly improves the odds of full recovery, underscoring the importance of screening at the first sign of trouble.

Sponsored

Phone, Video, or Live-Chat Support

BetterHelp provides therapy in a way that works for YOU. Fill out the questionnaire, get matched, begin therapy.

Get Started

Answer a few questions to get started

Comorbid Mental Health Conditions

Co-occurring disorders can complicate treatment but also clarify how EDs often arise amid broader psychological struggles.

• Mood disorders: Up to 50–70% of those with anorexia or bulimia have a history of major depression. Bipolar disorder occurs less frequently but still above population averages.
• Anxiety disorders: Two-thirds of individuals with an ED report an anxiety disorder at some point, especially obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Rigidity and perfectionism in anorexia can overlap with OCD traits.
• Substance use disorders (SUDs): About 50% of people with eating disorders also misuse alcohol or drugs - roughly 5 times the rate in the general population. This co-occurrence is seen prominently in bulimia (30–70% have a lifetime SUD).
• Personality disorders: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) correlates strongly with bulimic and binge-type symptoms, while obsessive-compulsive personality traits align more often with restrictive anorexia.

When EDs and other mental health conditions intersect, integrated treatment can significantly improve outcomes. Failure to address coexisting problems, however, often perpetuates the disordered eating cycle.

Physical Health Consequences

Eating disorders are not just about food and weight; they can damage nearly every organ system.

• Cardiac risks:
  • Bradycardia and hypotension in anorexia result from severe malnutrition and an atrophied heart muscle.
  • Electrolyte imbalances (e.g., low potassium) from purging can cause lethal arrhythmias or cardiac arrest.
• Bone density: About 30% of those with anorexia develop osteoporosis, and up to 90% show reduced bone mass. Early bone loss can lead to fractures in adolescence or early adulthood.
• Gastrointestinal damage:
  • Gastroparesis slows digestion in restrictive disorders, causing bloating and nausea.
  • Esophageal inflammation or tearing can result from repeated vomiting in bulimia.
• Reproductive and endocrine issues: Loss of menstrual cycles (amenorrhea) in anorexia or bulimia disrupts hormones and can harm fertility. Men with anorexia can have low testosterone.
• Heightened mortality risk: Someone in the U.S. dies as a direct result of an eating disorder roughly every hour. Cardiac complications and suicide are common causes of death.

Recovery can reverse some damage, such as heart rate normalization and improved GI function, but long-term deficits (like chronic bone loss) may persist. Prompt, well-rounded medical and psychiatric care is vital to minimize irreversible harm.

Cost of Treatment

Because eating disorders often require months or years of care, treatment costs can be staggeringly high.

• The average single treatment episode for an eating disorder is around $80,000, though full recovery (including stepped-down levels of care) can cost $250,000 or more.
• Insurance coverage is variable. Many private plans limit residential coverage; Medicaid/Medicare often do not cover residential at all. Families often face large out-of-pocket burdens or exhausting battles for insurer approvals.

These financial strains can lead patients to end treatment prematurely or never start in the first place, exacerbating medical and psychiatric risks.

Familial and Genetic Factors

Family history is a leading predictor of who might develop an eating disorder.

• Heritability: Twin studies suggest about 50–60% of the risk for anorexia or bulimia is genetic, while binge eating disorder may have around 40% heritability.
• Elevated risk: Having a first-degree relative with an ED can increase one’s likelihood of developing an eating disorder by 10 times compared to someone without that family history.
• Shared traits: Genes linked to temperament - such as anxiety, perfectionism, or impulsivity - often manifest across siblings, along with potential metabolic or hormonal vulnerabilities.
• Environment: Learned behaviors (e.g., critical comments about weight, parental dieting) also play a role. Genetic predisposition plus a dieting-triggering environment often leads to ED onset in adolescents.

While genes are not destiny, knowing a family history of EDs can encourage proactive measures, like promoting balanced eating and open discussions about body image from an early age.

Geographic and Socioeconomic Patterns

Eating disorders are found in all corners of the country and across all income levels.

• Urban vs. rural: Diagnosis rates tend to be higher in metropolitan areas for bulimia, possibly due to greater access to specialists. Yet rural communities have comparable (or higher) overall risk when underdiagnosis is taken into account.
• Socioeconomic status (SES):
  • Historically, anorexia was considered a “rich, white, suburban” issue, but current data show EDs afflict low-income populations at similar or higher rates.
  • Food insecurity correlates with binge and purge behaviors, as erratic access to food may prompt cycles of overeating and compensatory restriction.
  • Lower SES groups face more barriers to treatment, including insurance limitations and scarce specialized care.
• Cultural factors: Western beauty ideals have spread globally via media, increasing ED behaviors in areas that once prized larger body types (e.g., a well-documented spike in Fiji after the introduction of Western television).

No demographic is “safe” from ED risk - affluent or not, rural or urban. Disparities in diagnosis and care remain, however, making equitable access to treatment a significant public health challenge.

Cultural Identities and Race/Ethnicity

Stripping away older misconceptions about who “can” develop an eating disorder is key to inclusive care.

• BIPOC prevalence: Black, Hispanic/Latinx, Asian American, and Indigenous individuals are just as likely - if not more likely - to engage in disordered eating behaviors compared to white peers.
• Underdiagnosis: BIPOC communities often face implicit bias from providers, plus stigma around mental health. As a result, they are about half as likely to receive an ED diagnosis or proper treatment.
• Acculturation stress: First- or second-generation immigrants can experience pressure to match Western body ideals, leading to higher bulimia or binge eating rates.
• Body ideals and media: Although some cultures traditionally accept fuller figures, global media trends have introduced the thin-ideal or “fit-ideal” widely. Social pressures to conform can accelerate ED risk.

Increasing cultural competency in clinical settings - by addressing language needs, acknowledging cultural food practices, and recognizing diverse body ideals - helps BIPOC individuals receive timely and accurate care.

The Role of Traditional Media

For decades, mass media has promoted thinness (for women) and lean muscularity (for men) as the cultural norm.

• Thin ideal messages: Women’s magazines, TV shows, and ads often feature underweight models. Even brief exposure to such images increases body dissatisfaction.
• Fiji study: After Western TV arrived in a region of Fiji, 11.3% of adolescent girls reported purging behaviors within a few years - whereas it had been virtually unknown before.
• Celebrity culture: Headlines critiquing weight gain or praising drastic postpartum weight loss reinforce harmful notions that smaller is always “better.”
• Men and media: Advertisements showcasing ripped physiques can lead men to restrictive eating, excessive exercise, or supplement misuse to achieve a “cut” look.

While media alone does not cause eating disorders - genes, environment, and personality traits all factor in - it’s a potent amplifier of body dissatisfaction and diet obsession. Counteracting these pressures with media literacy programs and diverse body representation can help.

Sports Participation

Certain athletic environments foster conditions where disordered eating can fester undetected.

• High-risk sports:
  • Aesthetic pursuits like gymnastics, figure skating, and ballet place a premium on being slim, fueling high rates of anorexia and bulimia.
  • Weight-class sports (e.g., wrestling, boxing, rowing) often encourage extreme short-term weight loss that can mirror bulimic patterns.
• Prevalence among athletes: Female athletes in judged sports may exhibit ED rates up to 2–3 times higher than non-athletes. Male wrestlers are more likely to purge compared to non-wrestlers.
• RED-S/“Female Athlete Triad”: Under-fueling leads to disrupted menstruation, weakened bones, and performance decline. Many female runners and dancers face stress fractures and recurrent injuries.
• Team sports: Activities like soccer or basketball, which focus less on weight and more on skill, have lower ED rates.

When coaches emphasize appearance over overall health, athletes may feel pressured to diet or purge. Education for coaches and trainers about proper fueling and mental health can prevent these dangerous behaviors.

Academic Performance

Eating disorders can erode a student’s ability to concentrate, attend classes, or maintain healthy study habits.

• Malnutrition and cognition: Prolonged undernourishment reduces mental focus, memory retention, and energy, frequently lowering test scores and GPAs.
• School absences: Hospitalizations, medical appointments, or sheer fatigue lead to missed classes. Some high school and college students drop out or take medical leaves to seek treatment.
• Perfectionism paradox: Many ED sufferers were high achievers initially, but the illness eventually impairs academic success.
• Improvement with recovery: As weight stabilizes or binging/purging behaviors ease, cognitive function rebounds. Students in treatment often see higher subsequent GPAs than those who remain untreated.

Educators, parents, and counselors who notice a sudden drop in academic performance or increased absences should consider an eating disorder as a potential underlying cause and connect students to appropriate help.

Social Media’s Impact

Modern social platforms intensify appearance comparisons like never before.

• Constant exposure: A significant majority of teens scroll through Instagram, TikTok, or Snapchat multiple times a day. Filtered images depict unrealistic body ideals, spurring negative self-comparisons.
• Community influence: Hashtags like #thinspo or #fitspo - sometimes disguised to evade content restrictions - can normalize extreme dieting or purging. “Diet challenges” can go viral, encouraging harmful behaviors.
• Increased risk: Teens spending 2+ hours daily on social media face notably higher odds of body image dissatisfaction and disordered eating.
• Positive possibilities: Body-positive and recovery-oriented accounts do exist. Following diverse, non-triggering content can help users counter harmful ideals and find support communities for healing.

Therapists increasingly advise ED patients to limit or carefully curate their social media use, avoiding triggering material and prioritizing recovery-focused content instead.

Most eating disorders emerge from a complex mix of biological vulnerabilities, environmental triggers, and cultural messages. Whether it’s the cost of treatment, the prevalence in certain sports, or the mental health conditions that often accompany EDs, the data make one point abundantly clear: these illnesses can affect anyone, and recovery typically demands a multi-pronged approach.

Addressing gaps in care - especially for men, rural residents, low-income families, and communities of color - remains a major public health challenge. Policymakers, insurance providers, and healthcare systems can work together to remove financial barriers, expand early screening, and provide culturally competent services.

Still, there is hope. Research confirms that evidence-based therapies save lives and improve quality of life. Early detection, a supportive network, and sustained clinical care can turn even severe cases around. By spreading awareness of these statistics, we can destigmatize eating disorders, encourage timely help, and ultimately help more individuals reclaim their health and well-being.

While the path to full remission can be long - occasionally spanning many years - data show that a majority do regain healthy functioning over time with the right treatments. As more providers train in best practices and more families understand what to watch for, the future can hold greater access to lifesaving intervention and lasting recovery.

Sponsored

Get matched with an affordable mental health counselor

Find a Therapist

Answer a few questions to get started